*BSD News Article 95256


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!feeder.chicago.cic.net!chi-news.cic.net!data.ramona.vix.com!nnrp1.crl.com!not-for-mail
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: ? Union FS
Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 04:11:00 -0700
Organization: Walnut Creek CDROM
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <33799DC4.794BDF32@FreeBSD.org>
References: <5lc128$ieg@vestein.arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: time.cdrom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-STABLE i386)
To: "Wilhelm B. Kloke" <wb@arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de>
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:40830

Wilhelm B. Kloke wrote:
> 
> As I find the idea of union filesystem really useful, I wonder how the
> state of this is in FreeBSD. AFAIK in FreeBSD unionfs is buggy, in
> NetBSD it is usable. But I don't really want to switch over to NetBSD
> as I like FreeBSD for other things.

It's being worked on in 3.0 right now and has made substantial progress
towards being usably stable. Kato (the developer working on it) has also
provided patches for the 2.2 branch but, AFAIK, nobody took him up on
his offer to test them. :)
-- 
- Jordan Hubbard
  FreeBSD core team / Walnut Creek CDROM.