Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!not-for-mail From: David Henshaw <dhenshaw@silas.cc.monash.edu.au> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Window Manager differences ? Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 14:56:36 +1000 Organization: Monash University Lines: 18 Message-ID: <338E5E04.41C67EA6@silas.cc.monash.edu.au> References: <338A3794.167EB0E7@silas.cc.monash.edu.au> <874tbps4ue.fsf@phaedrus.uchicago.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: ascendp-int-25.cc.monash.edu.au Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NNTP-Posting-User: root X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.1.5-RELEASE i386) To: stephen farrell <stephen+usenet@farrell.org> Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:41851 stephen farrell wrote: > > David Henshaw <dhenshaw@silas.cc.monash.edu.au> writes: > > > Hi all, > > > > Yesterday I decided to install AfterStep 1.0 as a new WM option. > > Previously I was using FVWM. > > > > Is it my imagination or is there a speed difference between the two ? > > Which way? Well personally, I think AfterStep seems quicker :) -- David Henshaw dhenshaw@silas.cc.monash.edu.au