Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP id AA6313 ; Thu, 07 Jan 93 21:08:08 EST Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:22036 comp.unix.bsd:9755 Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!uunet!faculty!nmrdc1!dsc3pzp From: dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: 386 BSD Message-ID: <C0Kqzu.I43@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil> Date: 9 Jan 93 06:50:15 GMT References: <1iicelINNa01@agate.berkeley.edu> <1993Jan8.100444.14891@amscons.amscons.com> Organization: Naval Medical Research & Development Command Lines: 14 Regarding 386BSD vs. Linux... What about C Library compatiblity with the bulk of packages obtainable from the Internet. Univel (Novell/USL) may well stop the anti-BSDI suits so the valuable development work on BSD can continue for another decade, but ignoring legal issues, Which provides the greatest level of compatibility with the bulk of packages available off the Internet, so far as the c libraries are concerned? 386BSD or Linux??? -- =========================================================================== phil perucci | "Any opinions expressed are solely my own views and ssb1pzp@digex.com | do not reflect the position of any organization" ===========================================================================