Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!nntp.sei.cmu.edu!news.psc.edu!not-for-mail From: peterb@hoopoe.psc.edu (Peter Berger) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc Subject: Re: Is NetBSD alive? Date: 5 Jun 1997 08:45:34 -0400 Organization: Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center Lines: 15 Message-ID: <5n6cde$l4@hoopoe.psc.edu> References: <01bc6c60$f76eb860$5f030514@yosemite> <EB670F.Frx@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> <5n1l6v$lln@panix2.panix.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: hoopoe.psc.edu Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:6070 In article <5n1l6v$lln@panix2.panix.com>, Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@rek.tjls.com> wrote: >many users also seem to have >this funny desire to have support for their wacky, already-paid-for hardware, >even if that support doesn't always work 100%, rather than to build machines >just to run NetBSD, even if they'd perform better and wouldn't cost any, or >much, more. Uh, gee. This sounds like why NetBSD supports DECstations, to me. -- Pete Berger, Esq. Coordinator, Regional Information Infrastructure Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center peterb@psc.edu http://www.psc.edu/~peterb I don't speak for my employers, nor they for me.