Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP
id AA6417 ; Sat, 09 Jan 93 11:02:00 EST
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!cs.weber.edu!terry
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C)
Subject: Re: [386bsd] f2c with record/structure support
Message-ID: <1993Jan11.212052.1545@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
Keywords: 386bsd, f2c
Sender: news@fcom.cc.utah.edu
Organization: Weber State University (Ogden, UT)
References: <1993Jan10.211632.3269@ll.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 21:20:52 GMT
Lines: 32
In article <1993Jan10.211632.3269@ll.mit.edu> pope@ll.mit.edu (Frank Pope) writes:
>Hi
>
>Does anyone out there know of a f2c translator which has been ported to
>386bsd that has support for fortran records and structures. I believe
>these are features found in FORTRAN 90 [not sure]. I want to
>convert some software written using MS Fortran 5.1 to c and run it
>under 386bsd. Thanks in advance.
I don't know of many compilers, let alone translators, which support '90.
Historically, the ANSI-90 FORTRAN was rejected by most major vendors,
either due to a lack of backward compatability or conflicts with vendor
extensions (depending on the vendor); it was rejected by Harris, DEC,
HP, and IBM... dunno if Sun was involved at all.
The differences are significant enought that you will probably have to
do a fair bit of work to hack the most recent 386BSD translator (ftp'able
from ref.tfs.com).
Terry Lambert
terry@icarus.weber.edu
terry_lambert@novell.com
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I have an 8 user poetic license" - me
Get the 386bsd FAQ from agate.berkeley.edu:/pub/386BSD/386bsd-0.1/unofficial
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------