Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!feed1.news.erols.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!worldnet.att.net!newsadm From: kenneth.furge@ehusa.[NO_SPAM].com (Kenneth Furge) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: resolv.conf/named Question Date: 16 Jun 1997 13:00:16 GMT Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services Lines: 20 Message-ID: <5o3dd0$s9o@mtinsc02.worldnet.att.net> References: <5nv4bo$lob@netaxs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.146.192.238 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.8 (x86 32bit) Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:42874 Sure, have your resolv.conf point to yourself! - K.C. In article <5nv4bo$lob@netaxs.com>, heller@socko.cdnow.com says... > > > Simple question that I can't seem to find an answer to. > > If I'm running named, should I have a resolv.conf file? > I remember reading somewhere that you shouldn't have resolv.conf if you > are running named. > > On 2.1.7.1 running PPP, if I remove resolv.conf and startup the machine, > the boot sequence hangs when starting sendmail ( sometimes ), I hit control > c and continue with the boot, but networking is a bit messed up. > > > Karl