*BSD News Article 9787


Return to BSD News archive

Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP
	id AA6499 ; Sun, 10 Jan 93 07:03:56 EST
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uunet!psinntp!ficc!peter
From: peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva)
Subject: Re: 386BSD.EXE - Let DOS handle booting?
Message-ID: <id.QJNW._89@ferranti.com>
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
References: <C0q94w.48p@NeoSoft.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:25:20 GMT
Lines: 24

In article <C0q94w.48p@NeoSoft.com> karl@NeoSoft.com (Karl Lehenbauer) writes:
> Hey, how about making the second stage boot, say Julian's loader, an
> executable DOS program?

This is what Plan 9 does. I was at first repelled and disgusted, but on
reflection it sounds like a really nice idea. It would resolve the Compaq
boot problem, it would resolve the problem of video boards that require
magic DOS configuration programs, it would resolve the "how do I boot
386BSD on a second controller" problem, and so on.

Plus, it'd make it easier to hack around with the boot sequence. You could
build a new boot program without worrying about making your system non-
bootable. You could give it arguments

	bootbsd boot-options where init-options

	bootbsd as1a:386bsd.old
	bootbsd -large wd0a
	bootbsd -debug fd0a
-- 
Peter da Silva                                            `-_-'
Ferranti International Controls Corporation                'U` 
Sugar Land, TX  77487-5012 USA
+1 713 274 5180                            "Zure otsoa besarkatu al duzu gaur?"