Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!uunet!in1.uu.net!165.254.2.53!nonexistent.com!not-for-mail From: le@put.com (Louis Epstein) Subject: Re: 2.2.2 CDROM? X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] X-Complaints-To: Email abuse@news2.new-york.net if this posting is inappropriate Lines: 20 Organization: Putnam Internet Services Message-ID: <EBxKJM.1nx@nonexistent.com> References: <01bc7802$d91aa100$6330fa9e@org-qsar2.chem.msu.su> X-Trace: 866568512 28421 le [165.254.191.2] X-Nntp-Posting-Host: main.put.com Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 17:28:34 GMT Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:43065 J Wunsch (j@uriah.heep.sax.de) wrote: : le@put.com (Louis Epstein) wrote: : : > Is the next after this planned to be 2.2.5? : : I don't think any decision in this direction has been done yet. 2.2.2 : was only an incident. Jordan made this release since he was about to : make a release for the Xig/Walnut Creek CDE CD-ROM, and thus decided : that it was worthwhile to use the current RELENG_2_2 state, rather : than 2.2.1. (He was a little premature about this, too, so a few : possible bugfixes from -current are missing.) Well,there certainly seem to be a lot of listed differences between 2.2.1 and 2.2.2.(The CDROM 2.2.2 is identical to the FTP 2.2.2, unlike 2.1.6 where the CDROM was really 2.1.6.1?) Even before 2.2.2 documentation was telling us that the RELENG strain was building towards 2.2.5 as a next release goal,so I don't know what room there would be for a release before that! I gather 2.2.5 is a couple months off and 3.0R a bit further.