*BSD News Article 98256


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!feeder.chicago.cic.net!news2.digex.net!lynx.unm.edu!not-for-mail
From: colinj@taos.cs.unm.edu (Colin Eric Johnson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Appletalk Tunneling / UAR & CAP
Date: 22 Jun 1997 20:59:41 -0600
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <5okoqt$gm1$1@taos.cs.unm.edu>
References: <5obham$gt8@lemur.magnet.com>
Reply-To: Colin E. Johnson <colinj@unm.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: taos.cs.unm.edu
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:43344

In article <5obham$gt8@lemur.magnet.com>,
Paul Danckaert <pauld@magnet.com> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying to get an appletalk tunnel setup between two FreeBSD 2.2.2 boxes,
>and am having a fair ammount of trouble.  The only way that I know of to do
>this is via UAR (with CAP), however UAR doesn't seem to work very well under
>FreeBSD.  Does anybody have UAR working, or have ideas on other programs 
>to use, to do this tunnel?

I can say that I'm not sure what you mean by tunneling. You could set
up netatalk (http://www.umich.edu/~rsug/netatalk/) which is the ``other
game in town'' for handling Appletalk under unix. If the goal is to
get the machines to route appletalk between two networks, or something
like that, netatalk should work great.

-- 
Colin E. Johnson | colinj@unm.edu | http://www.unm.edu/~colinj/
Life is a movie, write your own ending - J. Henson, et al.