*BSD News Article 98948


Return to BSD News archive

#! rnews 1199 bsd
From: "Boris Mikhailov" <bor@sbtx.tmn.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Parity vs Non-Parity RAM
Date: 4 Jul 1997 04:00:31 GMT
Organization: Sibitex
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <01bc8837$719b1920$520254c2@bm2.tmn.ru>
References: <5p552o$g9s@legends.cet.com> <5p6d38$5uv$1@flea.best.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bm2.tmn.ru
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.sovam.com!sovam!demos!news.rssi.ru!news.incoma.ru!news.toribank.ru!news.rosprint.net!news.ekaterinburg.rosprint.ru!news.tmn.ru!not-for-mail
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:43918



Matt Dillon <dillon@flea.best.net> wrote in article
<5p6d38$5uv$1@flea.best.net>...

>     Personally, I think the Pentium Pro's are faster and more
reliable
>     cpu's with their full-frequency on-chip secondary cache, and
the
>     PPro's will do ECC while the Pentium and Pentium II's will not.

i430HX chipset can support ECC with true parity SIMMs
go http://www.asus.com/products/specs/mb/P55T2P4-spec.asp

-- 
Boris Mikhailov