Return to BSD News archive
#! rnews 1199 bsd From: "Boris Mikhailov" <bor@sbtx.tmn.ru> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Parity vs Non-Parity RAM Date: 4 Jul 1997 04:00:31 GMT Organization: Sibitex Lines: 17 Message-ID: <01bc8837$719b1920$520254c2@bm2.tmn.ru> References: <5p552o$g9s@legends.cet.com> <5p6d38$5uv$1@flea.best.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: bm2.tmn.ru X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161 Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.sovam.com!sovam!demos!news.rssi.ru!news.incoma.ru!news.toribank.ru!news.rosprint.net!news.ekaterinburg.rosprint.ru!news.tmn.ru!not-for-mail Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:43918 Matt Dillon <dillon@flea.best.net> wrote in article <5p6d38$5uv$1@flea.best.net>... > Personally, I think the Pentium Pro's are faster and more reliable > cpu's with their full-frequency on-chip secondary cache, and the > PPro's will do ECC while the Pentium and Pentium II's will not. i430HX chipset can support ECC with true parity SIMMs go http://www.asus.com/products/specs/mb/P55T2P4-spec.asp -- Boris Mikhailov