*BSD News Article 99150


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!news.utell.co.uk!shift.utell.net!nobody
From: brian@shift.utell.net (Brian Somers)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Highest supported baud rate on serial line?
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 15:19:52 +0100
Organization: Awfulhak Ltd.
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <8utqp5.8c.ln@shift.utell.net>
References: <87d8ows443.fsf@localhost>
Reply-To: brian@awfulhak.org, brian@utell.co.uk
NNTP-Posting-Host: shift.utell.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.8
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:44051

In article <87d8ows443.fsf@localhost>,
	gorski@poboxes.com writes:
> 
> 
> I tried to use pppd with baud rates greater 115200 and it exists with:
>         Jul  6 14:43:59 pppd[2997]: tcsetattr: Invalid argument
> 
> This looks for me that the baud rate maximum is 115200! 
> Then I decided to patch sio.c:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *** /sys/i386/isa/sio.c	Sun Jul  6 14:55:43 1997
> --- sio.c	Sun Jul  6 15:14:28 1997
> ***************
> *** 359,367 ****
>   	{ 38400,	COMBRD(38400) },
>   	{ 57600,	COMBRD(57600) },
>   	{ 115200,	COMBRD(115200) },
> -         { 230400,       COMBRD(230400) },
> -         { 460800,       COMBRD(460800) },
> -         { 921600,       COMBRD(921600) },
>   	{ -1,		-1 }
>   };
>   
> --- 359,364 ----
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Result: pppd is quite and the serial line(with NS16550) works without 
> any problems. Why isn't this done before by someone else?  Should I
> expect any errors with these higher baud rates?
> 
> 
> Any hints/information?

I'm sure it's trickier than that.  The UART has a register for
setting the speed where the lower the value you write there, the
faster the setting.  115200 is 1 in this register (or was it
zero).

I suspect the above has just confused the COMBRD macro.

> Thanks.
> 
> - Achim
> 
> 

-- 
Brian <brian@awfulhak.org> <brian@freebsd.org>
      <http://www.awfulhak.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !