Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!not-for-mail From: Nathan Hand <nathan.hand@anu.edu.au> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Can I replace CorelDraw?? Date: 19 Jul 1997 22:29:08 +1000 Lines: 18 Sender: nathanh@stoli.spirits.org.au Message-ID: <m290z3fcob.fsf@stoli.spirits.org.au> References: <86iuy8jire.fsf@kiste-5.ki.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 150.203.148.79 X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.misc:185671 comp.os.linux.advocacy:106120 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:44667 Marko Schuetz <marko@kiste-5.ki.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> writes: > I have a friend who is a CorelDraw poweruser. He is currently running > OS/2 on his machine and CorelDraw v 4 in the WinOS > emulation. Unfortunately he is thinking about using the Win95 version > of CorelDraw v 7. What should I recommend? The software I know that is > closest to his needs is xfig (I am not into graphics). Buy Coreldraw for UNIX. Currently version 3.5 (which is the same as version 7.0 in the Windows 95 market, I think). http://www.caldera.com/solutionsCD/Products/Corel/Info/draw35.htm -- The idea that an arbitrary naive human should be able to properly use a given tool without training or understanding is even more wrong for computing than it is for other tools (eg automobiles, airplanes, guns or power saws).